- Jul 10, 2010
- 2,439
- 6,692
- Moderator
- #211
I don't even know why people don't understand small senior placements. If you look at how close those top scores were:
Day 1: 97.6 / 97.4 / 97.05
Day 2: 98.31 / 98.0 / 98.2
Final: 98.13 / 97.85 / 97.91
(LL / SSX / BSW)
any single mistake as small as a sb could have changed those placements. There were only 0.28 points difference between first and third place; 0.34 points between first and fourth.
I just watched the videos of the top three, especially BSW and SSX. I don't think that BSW outscored SSX in difficulty (most things were pretty equal, with their tumbling being weaker than SSX), but their execution was a lot better, especially in tumbling.
Day 1: 97.6 / 97.4 / 97.05
Day 2: 98.31 / 98.0 / 98.2
Final: 98.13 / 97.85 / 97.91
(LL / SSX / BSW)
any single mistake as small as a sb could have changed those placements. There were only 0.28 points difference between first and third place; 0.34 points between first and fourth.
I just watched the videos of the top three, especially BSW and SSX. I don't think that BSW outscored SSX in difficulty (most things were pretty equal, with their tumbling being weaker than SSX), but their execution was a lot better, especially in tumbling.