- Dec 15, 2009
- 4,268
- 5,993
- Moderator
- #46
@catlady and anyone else who wants to make sure to read page 15 on of this SCOTUS brief that legally describes the monopolistic practices of Varsity using legal precedent. Even if not reversed, should the sport accept Varsity practices as not being wrong?So now it's not PG & E, it's the Royal Manticoran Navy?
I give enough credit to people if they experience, see or hear anything illegal, they'll give that information to the proper authority for the courts to decide. Otherwise, there's "tea" and then there's just "bitterness" on how things evolve, go down, and how people say it should be versus the law.
I'll just end my portion in this thread by stating any other "tea" event post you quote me in, my response above remains the same. If it's illegal I don't support or condone it. If it's legal, we have the choice to support it or not. That has been, and always will be, the "tea".