All-Star Usasf Major Changes

Welcome to our Cheerleading Community

Members see FEWER ads... join today!

"The most common mechanism of injury was a collision between two or more cheerleaders."
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):521-6.
Epidemiology of cheerleading injuries presenting to NEISS hospitals from 2002 to 2007.

Source

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University, 818 W. Hancock, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Abstract

BACKGROUND:​

Cheerleading has developed into a complex sport utilizing aspects of dance, gymnastics/tumbling, single- and multiple-partner stunts, and tosses in complex displays. Stunting and tosses elevates one or multiple participants into the air supported by teammates putting all at significant injury risk.
METHODS:​

We reviewed all cheerleading injuries captured by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission National Electronic Injury Surveillance System from 2002 to 2007 that presented to US Emergency Departments and used the new narrative feature added in 2002 to better differentiate injury context and severity.
RESULTS:​

There were 4,245 cases of cheerleaders presenting to National Electronic Injury Surveillance System Emergency Departments from 2002 to 2007 with an average age of 14.6 years, and 96.3% were female. Most of these injuries could be treated as outpatients (97.9%). The extremities were most likely affected, 2,610 (61.5%), with further distribution breakdown as follows: upper extremity 1,339 (31.5%), lower extremity 1,271 (29.9%), head and neck 1,085 (25.6%), trunk 491 (11.6%), and other 48.0 (1.1%). The type of injury sustained in descending order is as follows: sprains/strains 1,871 (44.1%), fractures 709 (16.7%), and contusions 684 (16.1%). The most common mechanism of injury was a collision between two or more cheerleaders (1,242; 29.3% overall), followed by stunting (841; 19.8% overall), tumbling (478, 11.3% overall), and tossing (105, 2.5% overall). Subset analysis was performed on fracture, admit, and severe injury groups.
CONCLUSIONS:​

The upper extremity was the most commonly injured part of the body and sustained a significantly greater number of fractures. However, head injuries were more likely to be severe. The value of a more detailed database specific to cheerleading could be invaluable in identifying risk factors and activity-specific injury patterns and facilitate implementing safety measures.
 
The most common mechanism of injury was a collision between two or more cheerleaders (1,242; 29.3% overall), followed by stunting (841; 19.8% overall), tumbling (478, 11.3% overall), and tossing (105, 2.5% overall). Subset analysis was performed on fracture, admit, and severe injury groups.
Hmmm...looks like USASF needs to make a new rule making collisions illegal.
 
The value of a more detailed database specific to cheerleading could be invaluable in identifying risk factors and activity-specific injury patterns and facilitate implementing safety measures.

This is what we're all looking for. This is what the USASF is saying their basing their rule changes off of. It doesn't exist yet, as far as anyone knows.

Thank you for posting that study. That seems to be so far the only official study that's been found.
 
we all know certain stunting is much more dangerous

Exactly!!!!!!!!! The most serious severe injuries I have seen, know of, & have heard of are from stunting including concusions & even fatal injuries.
Don't worry...I'm sure that's next. Tumbling probably seemed less transparent..but since they decided they can just make up rules whenever they want, I bet stunting isn't too far off!
 
FYI--just copying these as I see them--yet another study that doesn't mention tumbling----

Am J Sports Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;31(6):881-8.
Catastrophic cheerleading injuries.

Source

The Orthopaedic Center, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.
Abstract

BACKGROUND:​

There are few epidemiologic studies of cheerleading injuries.
PURPOSE:​

To develop a profile of catastrophic injuries in cheerleading and to describe relevant risk factors.
STUDY DESIGN:​

Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS:​

We reviewed 29 of 39 incidents of cheerleading injuries reported to the National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research from 1982 to 2002.
RESULTS:​

Twenty-seven of the injured cheerleaders were women. There were 1.95 direct catastrophic injuries per year or 0.6 injuries per 100,000 participants. The rate of injuries among college cheerleaders was five times that of high school participants. The most common stunts performed at the time of injury were a pyramid (9) or a basket toss (8). Catastrophic injuries included 17 severe head injuries, resulting in 13 skull fractures and 2 deaths; 8 cervical fractures or major ligament injuries; 3 spinal cord contusions; and 1 concomitant head injury and cervical fracture.
CONCLUSIONS:​

Suggestions for reducing catastrophic injuries in cheerleaders include enhancing the number and training of spotters, mandating floor mats for complex stunts, restricting complex stunts when surfaces are wet, and encouraging safety certification of coaches. Pyramids and basket tosses should be limited to experienced cheerleaders who have mastered all other skills and should be performed with spotters and landing mats.
 
I thought Restricted Level 5 leveled the playing field. It give a different option for level 5 to fit different needs.
Yeah but everyone and their mother wants to take a team to worlds instead of going to the division they need to be in (restricted 5).


I haven't looked at the studies yet, but are they posted by an actual medical journal? If not then they don't hold much value.
 
Yeah but everyone and their mother wants to take a team to worlds instead of going to the division they need to be in (restricted 5).


I haven't looked at the studies yet, but are they posted by an actual medical journal? If not then they don't hold much value.
Yes, all the studies I have found are from medical journals. American Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, American Journal of Emergency Medicine, etc.
 
Yes, all the studies I have found are from medical journals. American Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, American Journal of Emergency Medicine, etc.
Thanks for posting this. Finally some real information. So I'm guessing that synchronized tumbling should be the next thing to go?
 
Back