OT #teamtawnj

[Mamarazzi]

Not so long ago, Admin, DJ and Lakerfantlc were friends. Then there was some Cali drama that went down with Admin on one side and DJ and Lakerfantlc on the other. Now, every once in awhile there's personal attacks on both sides...and as we see today, a banning (currently open-ended, so they may not be back for awhile) when absolutely nothing bannable ( think I made that word up) has happened.

Oh Lord, this again?
Why can't they get along???

 

[mstealtoyou]

Oh Lord, this again?
Why can't they get along???

I agree with this. We're all adults and should play nicely in public.

 

[armycheermom]

Wow, i'm teaching my cp to play nice with others on public forms, didn't think adults needed to learn it too...

 

[cupieqt]

Oh em gee. I knew I didn't understand what was happening before but now I'm super confused. Sigh. Fierceboard politics.

 

[King]

I'm kinda out of the office today. Will look at it all tomorrow or Friday. So I have to review.

 

[cupieqt]

I agree with this. We're all adults and should play nicely in public.

Double oh em gee! You changed your avatar!

 

[mstealtoyou]

Double oh em gee! You changed your avatar!

Admin did it for me. You like it?

 

[crazyredhead]

There was obviously a reason for the ban. Is there really a need for this to be a thread? I got banned (over worlds) where was my thread? Hmm theyll be back in a month or whatever no big deal.

 

[quitthedrama]

and personal bias shouldn't play into an open-ended banning.

I certainly don't know all of the specifics, but I have seen on occasion admins get huffy about a post that may strike a nerve with them personally, which is human nature. As outspoken as they may be (and I mean that as a compliment) , I haven't ever seen anything posted by either DJ or lakerfantlc that would deserve banning, so unless I missed something....
Maybe there should be a new rule that two or three different admins need to deem someone's post(s) inappropriate in order for someone to be banned.
Can we post bail for our banned friends?:cookie:

 

[cupieqt]

Admin did it for me. You like it?

Yes. Can't decide if I should be scared or pet you though

 

[Admin]

Maybe there should be a new rule that two or three different admins need to deem someone's post(s) inappropriate in order for someone to be banned.

5 admins made this decision.

 

[cupieqt]

Bail is set at 1,000 shimmies. I volunteer to collect them.

 

[Mamarazzi]

I'm kinda out of the office today. Will look at it all tomorrow or Friday. So I have to review.

I hope you're in the office if I ever get banned. Are there other people who have the authority to review a ban?

 

[quitthedrama]

5 admins made this decision.

wow.....um...ok.....guess I will be very careful about what I post in this new fierceboard

 

[Mamarazzi]

wow.....um...ok.....guess I will be very careful about what I post in this new fierceboard

That's what I'm thinking. Not saying they didn't say anything, ever, but I'm just wondering what was so bad that they were banned for it. I mean, I saw nothing on the avatar thread at all...