- Oct 14, 2012
- 4,954
- 7,377
oh i read the article im just curious to see if anyone saw the actual list. I mean you spend weeks threatening people with this dumb list, and then dont even show it. Why do i get the feeling the list is probably blank. And while i get it helped his "goal" of exposing some anons, i guarantee those anons will just create new accounts and start all over again now that this "groundbreaking" article is finally out.No need to sign up. I was able to read it and will disagree on being well written. Especially since it really wasn’t what I was expecting based on the teasers.
If CU has a list of screen names matches to real life names he is not releasing it but maybe rather using it as a threat. But as some anons has pointed out quite a few have previously outed themselves so is it really a threat to be exposed?
**Be like Elsa and Let it go**
to me it read like a "i kinda tried at 3am the day before its due" college paper, and i need to use as many big words as possible to... it didnt tell us anything that people already didnt know...
but i get it, its clickbait and his website probably generates some money for him the more people view it. You gotta pay those bills somehow....