All-Star Unrecognized Talent (#shouldbecheerlebritystatus)

Welcome to our Cheerleading Community

Members see FEWER ads... join today!

There are multiple previous threads. The words do not disappear when they are off the front page. Maybe, when you have a young girl that is prominant in cheer, you will have a better understanding of the sensitivity.

I understand that parents want to protect their child and stand up for them, but nothing about her has been said in this thread and you attacked a poster as if he did. Maybe he has said things in other threads, but that wasn't said here so there was no need to attack him. Stand up for your daughter, nothing wrong with that, but you often make the situation worse by what you say to others. There was no need to pick a fight in this thread, no reason at all.
 
I understand that parents want to protect their child and stand up for them, but nothing about her has been said in this thread and you attacked a poster as if he did. Maybe he has said things in other threads, but that wasn't said here so there was no need to attack him. Stand up for your daughter, nothing wrong with that, but you often make the situation worse by what you say to others. There was no need to pick a fight in this thread, no reason at all.

Straws and camels you know. You should read his pms, I give him credit, he is very upfront there about his perceived calling in cheer and why he posts the way he does. Not everyone erases the memory with every new thread.
 
You want to know what's funny StarshipTrooper ? In my posts, I wasn't actually talking about your daughter. We have been pming, you know my feelings towards the situation, and if you know anything about me from these threads, you should know that I would not hesitate for a second to type out "Maddie Gardner" in my posts when what I'm saying concerns her. It was not. My issues with Maddie's "cheerlebrity" status (as you now know) are not with whether she's deserving, it's how she has treated that status from my own minimal experiences. And it is not only my posts that you are assuming about your daughter, it is everything anyone has posted on this thread (and MANY others) concerning "cheerlebrities".

ETA: My feelings about your daughter, some of her teammates, and the team/program in general are no secret, just like the CEA fans who have said MUCH worse about athletes of programs I support (WC for example). Just because at one point or another I have made posts about Maddie does not mean that ALL of my posts are about Maddie.
 
Not ONCE in this thread did I attack you, your daughter, CEA,

I think the root of the problem lays within that statement above.

Yes, you do have some substance and often viable contributions, however you're lacking credibility, and even an attempt at unbiasedness because of your continued attacks on Maddie Gardner & the CEA program.

At least for me it was a simple, oh here he goes again situation when I saw where your points in this thread were directed.
 
And now back to your regularly scheduled thread:

everyone on ICE lightning. 18/20 (don't quote me but i know it's majority) standing fulls one of which is supposed to be a double. everyone on that team should be recognized for their talent.

False. Your #s are not accurate.
 
I think the root of the problem lays within that statement above.

Yes, you do have some substance and often viable contributions, however you're lacking credibility, and even an attempt at unbiasedness because of your continued attacks on Maddie Gardner & the CEA program.

At least for me it was a simple, oh here he goes again situation when I saw where your points in this thread were directed.

The fact of the matter is that you all are ASSUMING my posts were directed there. Wanna know where my posts were directed? I'll tell you, but they weren't at Maddie. I can see why you'd assume they were, but when have I ever had an issue calling Maddie out specifically, or giving my opinions on Maddie specifically and mentioning her name? Never.
 
And now back to your regularly scheduled thread:

everyone on ICE lightning. 18/20 (don't quote me but i know it's majority) standing fulls one of which is supposed to be a double. everyone on that team should be recognized for their talent.

For accuracy's sake, from what I can see, 6 do one to fulls in that formation and at least 2 tuck. Not that it makes it less impressive that (considering those numbers) that means 12 would standing/toe full, but just for accuracy as I've heard that number 18 thrown around a lot.
 
The fact of the matter is that you all are ASSUMING my posts were directed there. Wanna know where my posts were directed? I'll tell you, but they weren't at Maddie. I can see why you'd assume they were, but when have I ever had an issue calling Maddie out specifically, or giving my opinions on Maddie specifically and mentioning her name? Never.

I'm just saying.. A leopard doesn't change his spots.
So it is easy to read ambiguous posts, with your past posts in head.
 
I'm just saying.. A leopard doesn't change his spots.
So it is easy to read ambiguous posts, with your past posts in head.

No, leopards don't change their spots, so I wouldn't have stopped myself from commenting on Maddie Gardner specifically if I was speaking about Maddie Gardner.
 
okay so 14- 16. I didn't know the cheer police were patrolling the board tonight...

Just attentive and honest.

Interesting how you could quickly adjust your # I still think their number is 11.
Maybe 12 on a good day or a goal.
 
Back