BlueCat
Roses are red, cats are blue
- Dec 14, 2009
- 4,503
- 19,507
For the math geeks out there, I am trying to come up with an objective-ish way to rank the senior level 5 teams over the last 10 years or so using primarily their results at Worlds. This is BY TEAM, not necessarily by program.
My main goal is to come up with a group of about 10-20 or so teams in the first "tier", then perhaps a group of 10-20 or so that would make up the next "tier". I would like to weight more recent results a bit more than ones in the past, but not over-do that. Those groupings are more important to me than the actual ranking within those groups, if that makes sense.
Thoughts?
Welcome to Google Docs
My main goal is to come up with a group of about 10-20 or so teams in the first "tier", then perhaps a group of 10-20 or so that would make up the next "tier". I would like to weight more recent results a bit more than ones in the past, but not over-do that. Those groupings are more important to me than the actual ranking within those groups, if that makes sense.
Thoughts?
Welcome to Google Docs