- Feb 18, 2016
- 563
- 1,259
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
I doubt you could do even a handstand in this without the ladies popping out. Literally the least supportive top I've ever seen in my life. Nope nope nope.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
I'm impressed you were able to look that closely.
The way the sleeves end by looping around the middle finger kills me.
I dunno I feel like this could grow on me. Reminds me of my old dance costumes.
I dunno I feel like this could grow on me. Reminds me of my old dance costumes.
I was thinking the same thing too. I also didn't want to be mean lol.No, no, that's exaclty what happened. Took the horrible drawings and made them into a horrible reality
(That was mean, I apologize. But that neckline... I shudder. And I cry. And I die a little. And I want to go towards the light.)
oh yes, the maidddd uniform haThe French Maid uniform? That's what it reminded me of. Either way, it's a no from me. The skort and the arms have loads of potential, I'm just not sure how everything's going to stay in place here. So many aspects seem to defy gravity.
ETA- the skort minus the butt applique
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
when I first saw it that's what I was thinking. I think it's super inappropriate and if I was a judge they'd probably get a warning (but I'm not a judge sooo)From the USASF guidelines: "All uniform pieces should adequately cover an athlete and must be secured to eliminate any possible wardrobe malfunction".
Not trying to pick on this team or gym, but just wondering if anyone else thinks this uniform is right on the line? It could be easily argued that a wardrobe malfunction is possible if not probable. Not sure how they go about enforcing this image policy anyway or if they do enforce it, but if this uniform doesn't raise eyebrows not sure what does...
From the USASF guidelines: "All uniform pieces should adequately cover an athlete and must be secured to eliminate any possible wardrobe malfunction".
Not trying to pick on this team or gym, but just wondering if anyone else thinks this uniform is right on the line? It could be easily argued that a wardrobe malfunction is possible if not probable. Not sure how they go about enforcing this image policy anyway or if they do enforce it, but if this uniform doesn't raise eyebrows not sure what does...
My prom dress from 1989 called...Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.
The way the sleeves end by looping around the middle finger kills me.