munchkinmom
Cheer Parent
- Jul 29, 2011
- 176
- 151
Ok, so I really did not like the changes to the all-star experience made by STUNT & NCATA. Looking at all the issues the past few months, it's made me think again...
What are some of our biggest gripes right now? Athlete registration, progression and proper training for coaches. What does USAG have down pat? Athlete registration, progression and proper training for coaches. What if...we make 2 parts to all-star? Compulsory & "optionals" if you will. Partner with USAG, modify the NCATA setup to make it work for 4-18+ not just college kids, register the athletes, register and train the coaches. NCATA-style meets are held everywhere, locally. This provides athlete leveling and is where promotion through the levels is determined. Outfits are simple "uniform style", like what NCATA has now. No makeup, no bows, no glitz. These are your "compulsories". You can still compete your team's routine as part of the meet, just like NCATA teams do now. There is no way that this can be the end of it though, because it would require an insane amount of time for the # of teams that exist in a typical competition to get through all of this.
So then we move on to the "optionals" aspect of this proposal. I propose this as one and the other, not either/or. Traditional all-star still exists. Same comps, same EPs, glitz, glam, custom uniforms, bows, & sass if the team wants - but now since the athletes are already playing by whatever level rules are create for the NCATA-style comp by USAG (that the insurance companies know and respect), the EPs are under insurance pressure to only compete athletes that belong where they are leveled. If an EP were to allow an athlete to compete up or down too far it could cause injuries (tumbling/flying/basing skills that they have proved they are not ready for on the high end, basing causing an inexperienced flier to go much higher than they should on a toss with true lower level girls on the low end).
Writing this instead of making dinner, so please excuse any confusion. Please feel free to discuss, rip it apart, chew it up, & put it back together and see if any of this is feasible.
What are some of our biggest gripes right now? Athlete registration, progression and proper training for coaches. What does USAG have down pat? Athlete registration, progression and proper training for coaches. What if...we make 2 parts to all-star? Compulsory & "optionals" if you will. Partner with USAG, modify the NCATA setup to make it work for 4-18+ not just college kids, register the athletes, register and train the coaches. NCATA-style meets are held everywhere, locally. This provides athlete leveling and is where promotion through the levels is determined. Outfits are simple "uniform style", like what NCATA has now. No makeup, no bows, no glitz. These are your "compulsories". You can still compete your team's routine as part of the meet, just like NCATA teams do now. There is no way that this can be the end of it though, because it would require an insane amount of time for the # of teams that exist in a typical competition to get through all of this.
So then we move on to the "optionals" aspect of this proposal. I propose this as one and the other, not either/or. Traditional all-star still exists. Same comps, same EPs, glitz, glam, custom uniforms, bows, & sass if the team wants - but now since the athletes are already playing by whatever level rules are create for the NCATA-style comp by USAG (that the insurance companies know and respect), the EPs are under insurance pressure to only compete athletes that belong where they are leveled. If an EP were to allow an athlete to compete up or down too far it could cause injuries (tumbling/flying/basing skills that they have proved they are not ready for on the high end, basing causing an inexperienced flier to go much higher than they should on a toss with true lower level girls on the low end).
Writing this instead of making dinner, so please excuse any confusion. Please feel free to discuss, rip it apart, chew it up, & put it back together and see if any of this is feasible.