- Feb 1, 2010
- 466
- 847
- Thread starter
- #46
agreed. If a team has a major fall and still wins, kudos to them for having an overall difficult, well performed and executed routine that could take a major deduction and still win it all.
But some teams can take that hit and still be called "clean" and others cannot. Are they clean or does the years of having that "opinion" about that team make them clean??? That IMO is what we are left with because the judging panels are so old and set in thier ways.
I am sorry but you cannot say in one breath that team x fell, then in the next say "they had a well executed routine". It's one or the other....for some.