BlueCat
Roses are red, cats are blue
- Dec 14, 2009
- 4,503
- 19,507
I didn't get the impression they were taking over control of USASF, just taking over the loan on on the condition that USASF becomes transparent and has open elections for the Board and other leadership positions.I for one am very interested to see how this pans out. However if I was the USASF idk how I would feel about being given ultimatums that come along with the loan. Now being independent is what the industry needs but I don't know how I feel about "we will do X but you have to do Y" independence is independence, what good I'd it to jump from a sole leader to multiple leaders? I'm not saying I agree or disagree with the terms but obviously they accepted the loan previously, why change hands?
Now if this were a buyout if the loan, I'd see things differently.
It is worth noting that I actually think most of the members of the board SHOULD be on the board. I would vote for most of them myself if given the opportunity. It is the way that the president, officers, & board have been selected (and essentially given lifetime appointments) that I have issue with.