- Dec 14, 2009
- 7,234
- 19,629
@tumbleyoda , while I can somewhat understand how some aspects of your post may make sense (in terms of known disregard for safety/proper progressions, etc), the problem I have is in dealing with 'absolutes' of any kind, especially something as multi-faceted as cheering. IMO, there are far too many variables for such an absolute to work unless every aspect of set criteria could be met 110% in terms of location, availability, scheduling etc. Since there will ALWAYS be that one person who defies the specifications, I don't think such stringent rigidity should be in place. With gymnastics, I've always felt like it was similar uses of set skills in different scenarios: roundoffs (on beam/floor/into the vault) handsprings (vault, floor, beam), handstands (basis of form for many skills on all the apparatuses), as opposed to cheer, which has more variety of skills and uses (stunting, tumbling, dance, jumps all have separate skills/techniques even though some utilize similar form bases). Since gymnastics has such similar skills across apparatuses, I expect a gym coach to be more qualified to teach everything across the board. If that were the case with cheer, we wouldn't have need for such specialty 'tumbling' coaches or choreographers who are used creatively etc. While every coach may be strong generally across, some might have better 'specialties' than others which is why you bring them on board to your staff.. Just my thoughts..