BlueCat
Roses are red, cats are blue
- Dec 14, 2009
- 4,503
- 19,507
- Thread starter
- #76
In the All-Star Industry it's all about Worlds i two was at the first and this paled in comparison. Sure there were shiny lights, but definatly did not compare...
Were you at both? We were and I can tell with absolute certainty that Worlds 2004 was not in the same league as Majors 2012 from a staging and experience point of view. They did a great job in 2004 given the circumstances, and Worlds has improved leaps and bounds since then, but let's not go overboard about 2004.
I can compare the two scoring systems and see that with these performances the results would have been completly different had this been on the worlds score sheet...
... and the teams probably would have had different routines if they knew they were going to be using the Worlds score sheets.
However, please explain exactly how the results would have been different and why. What specifically would get rewarded more/less on the different scoring systems and how would that have altered the ranking, in your opinion?