- Jul 19, 2011
- 2,215
- 5,502
With all the talk in the amazing lvl 2 teams thread, I figured we could have a place to share ideas about ways to stop sandbagging.
My thought is that if athletes were credentialed at their true level then a team could be composed of whatever level athletes they want BUT....they may not compete at a lower level then the average of the athletes level credentialing.
This would help small gyms who need to place higher athletes on lower teams, but keep teams from competing at too low of a level.
For example if Team A has 5 lvl 5 athletes, 5 lvl 4 athletes, 5 lvl 3 athletes, and 5 lvl 2 athletes all on one team, then their average would be level 3.5...
now there are two options..
1.you could either round up the normal way so average 3.5 would be level 4 and up, and 3.4 would be level 3 and up.
2.Just take the first number, so 3.0-3.9 would be level 3 and up, 4.0-4.9 would be level 4 and up..
Does anyone else have any other ideas?
My thought is that if athletes were credentialed at their true level then a team could be composed of whatever level athletes they want BUT....they may not compete at a lower level then the average of the athletes level credentialing.
This would help small gyms who need to place higher athletes on lower teams, but keep teams from competing at too low of a level.
For example if Team A has 5 lvl 5 athletes, 5 lvl 4 athletes, 5 lvl 3 athletes, and 5 lvl 2 athletes all on one team, then their average would be level 3.5...
now there are two options..
1.you could either round up the normal way so average 3.5 would be level 4 and up, and 3.4 would be level 3 and up.
2.Just take the first number, so 3.0-3.9 would be level 3 and up, 4.0-4.9 would be level 4 and up..
Does anyone else have any other ideas?