All-Star Large Senior And Worlds! If Only 3 Teams In The Division....

Welcome to our Cheerleading Community

Members see FEWER ads... join today!

Mar 24, 2010
1,470
1,399
they can't send 50% to finals, so I'd think USASF would have to send 2, meaning one of these teams would not compete in finals!

Would this be a correct assumption?
 
I was wondering how this would play out too. Would the USASF cancel the division for worlds if there is only 3 teams? (I don't want them too, but I could understand why if they did)
 
they can't send 50% to finals, so I'd think USASF would have to send 2, meaning one of these teams would not compete in finals!

Would this be a correct assumption?
I don't think this has ever happened before. I know there has been a division with only one team in it before. But unlimited actually got up to 8 so they were able to take 4 to finals.

One other thing about Large Senior. Last I checked, Charlotte Gold was in this division correct?

Next, no one knows about PSS, FCA, Cheers & More, and MACs
 
I was wondering how this would play out too. Would the USASF cancel the division for worlds if there is only 3 teams? (I don't want them too, but I could understand why if they did)
PACE competed in Int All Girl 6 a few years ago by themselves and took home the gold.
 
I thought that the NACCC was recommending that the top ten in each division made finals, regardless of division size. This would insure that CEA/WC/MT were in finals even if there were only 3-4 teams. This would also effectively create an incentive for teams to even out the distribution of teams among divisions. (want to go large senior in 2011 - automatically in finals!)

This also means fewer total performances, which allows things like: more divisions in the Field House (maybe all of finals?), more warmup time, possibly more seat availability, & possibly easier/more fair judging of finals.

There would be downsides as well. If you are in a huge division, this could dramatically decrease your chances of performing the final day.

I actually don't know what came out of that recommendation - I am not in the loop on very many decisions like this about Worlds.
 
I thought that the NACCC was recommending that the top ten in each division made finals, regardless of division size. This would insure that CEA/WC/MT were in finals even if there were only 3-4 teams. This would also effectively create an incentive for teams to even out the distribution of teams among divisions. (want to go large senior in 2011 - automatically in finals!)

This also means fewer total performances, which allows things like: more divisions in the Field House (maybe all of finals?), more warmup time, possibly more seat availability, & possibly easier/more fair judging of finals.

There would be downsides as well. If you are in a huge division, this could dramatically decrease your chances of performing the final day.

I actually don't know what came out of that recommendation - I am not in the loop on very many decisions like this about Worlds.
haha i don't know about this one.. even with however many large senior teams there were this year, it was these 3 teams that brought all of the people in!
 
haha i don't know about this one.. even with however many large senior teams there were this year, it was these 3 teams that brought all of the people in!
He was talking about the top 10 in each division. Not the fact that there are only 3 teams in large senior.
 
According to the wiki, Charlotte Gold is large senior so that makes 4 teams!
 
According to the wiki, Charlotte Gold is large senior so that makes 4 teams!
So that would still make 2 teams through to finals if they stay true to the 50% going through. I don't think all teams should make it through no matter how small the division is. If anything, I think it would make prelims as exciting as finals!

Guess we'll have to see what the other gyms that @imrichhowboutu mentioned are doing.
 
Me too! And I hope USASF doesn't make a new "rule" or exception that allows all of them to go through to finals. Stick to the rules.
 
Back