- Dec 14, 2009
- 111
- 76
my opinion, this is an excellent idea. the tiny teams are just having a fabulous time doing what they do out there. They don't need the extra pressure of placements, ,nor do they totally understand it. I especially agree with the sr. age change you propose, having a child that cheered on a sr team when she was 11( b4 age change to 12) My child had all the skills necessary to be there, I also thought my child had the maturity level. It turns out my child really didn't have the maturity level to be on a team with 18 yr olds, not at 11, or 12.I propose:
Senior: 14 - 18
Junior: 9 - 13
Youth: 6 - 10
All tiny is exhibition only. Maybe all tiny teams can compete for free at comps.
What is good about this? What is bad?
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk