- May 13, 2010
- 93
- 40
I actually think nothing should be limited, I just dont think its fair to only limit one, when the other has many risks as well. Im playing devil's advocate trying to find a legitimate reason why someone could only limit HS. but I cant find any reason why this would be done. I personally think that people want to limit HS so bad because they want those girls to go into AS cheer, which is not fair in my opinion.
I've got to disagree with this here. @kingston 's not talking about limiting HS only. it's just that through regualation with USASF comps and USASF coach's credentialing, all star already has "limits" in place that just don't exist at the school level..for a whole myriad of reasons. the injury rates in those that compete in school cheer vs. all star cheer (flooring) are going to be different. with all star cheer, the decision lies with the USASF, gym owners, and parents to make the best mutual decision on how to not only improve the sport but choose the best (most qualified) gym for their children. with school cheer, administratration, insurance, and budgeting comes into play as well which makes things more difficult to regulate and see their repercussions. because honestly "cheer safety" is unfortunately not going to be very high on the priority list, where with all star cheer, to the USASF and the individual gym owners, it means everything. does this mean that more kids will do all star cheer because skills are limited in school cheer? probably. but I've got to say that many cheerleaders (when all star cheer was evolving/newer) went to all star cheer beacuse their school teams in general did not have the advanced skills sets as a whole that all star did. so it's 50/50....