- Mar 16, 2011
- 5,591
- 21,171
Not with the whole "circumstantial" thing. Won't happen.
OT Casey Anthony Trial
- Thread starter flcheermom
- Start date
Welcome to our Cheerleading Community
Members see FEWER ads... join today!
Off Topic
Not with the whole "circumstantial" thing. Won't happen.
- Dec 14, 2009
- 7,234
- 19,629
Oh don't worry, I won't.
wcdad
Cheer Parent
- Dec 15, 2009
- 1,222
- 1,282
If it comes out that he was there or involved than they will file perjury charges.
- Jun 23, 2010
- 2,526
- 3,953
ONE year. the judge said she served enough time during the investigation. Shell be out this time next year.
- Apr 21, 2010
- 2,209
- 4,242
nope...she will be out by this august....it is just sick...judge will give her time for good behavior...
- Dec 15, 2009
- 5,561
- 7,491
The smile and laughing nature she had while she walked into her sentencing today was sickening. Her daughter is dead and she was just on trial for it and is laughing?
Yes the prosecution should be blamed for not doing thier job good enough, but I don't know how you can't hold those jurors to blame as well. With the information coming out about things that were said and the jurors actions give right to place some blame on them. They had an important task to do and they didn't even use the resources such as the evidence to help them come to this verdict. They stopped taking notes and did not review evidence which right there could have at least got her for manslaughter. They failed to take this important task and treat it with importance.
They could have found her guilty with the evidence that was provided. I am not saying that she could have been found for first degree murder, but the other two she could have been. She hid her daughter in the back of her trunk and didn't even get a guilty verdict for abuse. She could have been convicted of involuntary manslaughter because she did not seek help for her daughter if she did indeed drown or if she drugged her child and she died by an accident. How can they take the evidence and come to the conclusion neither was true?
No party involved did their job to the best of their ability and that goes for the prosecution, defense, or jury and all sides can have blame placed on them.
Yes the prosecution should be blamed for not doing thier job good enough, but I don't know how you can't hold those jurors to blame as well. With the information coming out about things that were said and the jurors actions give right to place some blame on them. They had an important task to do and they didn't even use the resources such as the evidence to help them come to this verdict. They stopped taking notes and did not review evidence which right there could have at least got her for manslaughter. They failed to take this important task and treat it with importance.
They could have found her guilty with the evidence that was provided. I am not saying that she could have been found for first degree murder, but the other two she could have been. She hid her daughter in the back of her trunk and didn't even get a guilty verdict for abuse. She could have been convicted of involuntary manslaughter because she did not seek help for her daughter if she did indeed drown or if she drugged her child and she died by an accident. How can they take the evidence and come to the conclusion neither was true?
No party involved did their job to the best of their ability and that goes for the prosecution, defense, or jury and all sides can have blame placed on them.
- Dec 15, 2009
- 5,561
- 7,491
nope...she will be out by this august....it is just sick...judge will give her time for good behavior...
It was just announced she will be out next Wednesday July 13 with credit served.
- Jun 23, 2010
- 2,526
- 3,953
Thats right though right? One year? CNN said four...? Now I'm just all confused D:nope...she will be out by this august....it is just sick...judge will give her time for good behavior...
ETA: nevermind
wcdad
Cheer Parent
- Dec 15, 2009
- 1,222
- 1,282
Thats right though right? One year? CNN said four...? Now I'm just all confused D:
ETA: nevermind
She has already been in jail during the trial.. That all counts as time served.
wcdad
Cheer Parent
- Dec 15, 2009
- 1,222
- 1,282
Have you ever served on a jury?
- Jun 23, 2010
- 2,526
- 3,953
Right. I probably should have read the whole sentance first, lol.
Are you a lawyer?
wcdad
Cheer Parent
- Dec 15, 2009
- 1,222
- 1,282
No, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express... lol
- Dec 15, 2009
- 5,561
- 7,491
I served on a mock jury for the law school. It was a 3 month murder trial and we took a week for the verdict because we went over every single bit of evidence and read over each note taken. Sure it wasn't a real trial but yes I know what it takes to be on a jury. They did not ask to review anything, for an important case like this any evidence is important evidence and should have been reviewed. 10 hours is nowhere near enough time to get a verdict for a case where the defense and prosecution did crappy jobs. That means the jury has an even harder job and they did it in 10 hours.
It is something that can be argued back and forth and some people can believe the jury did what they had to but looking at the case from the beginning to the end I feel otherwise.
- Jun 23, 2010
- 2,526
- 3,953
lol. You're very knowledgeable on this stuff.
My dad is a sex crimes detective, and my stepdad is a lawyer and I think I want to be involved in the legal system, it's so interesting to me.
- Dec 14, 2009
- 178
- 126
one year & $1000 for EACH of the 4 convictions, for 4 years & $4000. She'll be on the streets within a week or so.
Worlds 2024
Talk about Worlds!
Who is excited for UCA College Nationals?
Who is excited for UCA College Nationals? What teams are you rooting for?
Daughter just got taken out of flyer spot
Hi Cheer world! I need help with this...
The death of the Large Divisions
I think it's so sad that there are only two teams left in Large Coed. Do you think Steel, Cali...
